Review of the pass-through: a walk through an unknown node never overrides a
PromptManagerPair's execution record (any outcome but work-limit is
unverifiable while the record is checked); the run-time seed rule reads only
string outputs; a node with positive/negative inputs follows only the role of
the requested slot, nothing when it is unlinked; one text offered twice is one
candidate.
The inspector refused any node class missing from the semantics table, so a
PromptManagerPair behind an rgthree Any Switch showed "Prompt uses a node the
inspector does not support". The inspection resolver (Python and browser) now
reads through unknown nodes: a text input is the text, positive/negative route
by output slot, a conditioning input is followed alone, otherwise every linked
input except core type inputs (pass_through.skip_inputs). PromptManager nodes
are authoritative; several different texts become one candidate each
("Several prompts reach the sampler"). A seeded text node with no conditioning
input is generated at run time, and a recorded PromptManager execution is not
checked against text that passed through an unknown node.
INSPECTION_RESOLVER_VERSION goes to 2; ingestion keeps the default profile.
A legacy parity gate records every committed graph whose inspection positive
matches the legacy parser's; no graph may leave it.
Vito Sansevero