Files
ComfyAssets-ComfyUI_PromptM…/tests/test_inspection_outcomes.py
Vito 6d2213ead5 feat(inspect): declarative node support matrix (#250)
* feat(inspect): add a declarative inspection node semantics table

* fix(inspect): bound and isolate the semantics table

Bound the semantics loader: at most 1 MiB is read, containers may nest
at most eight levels, and a RecursionError from the JSON parser becomes
a SemanticsError instead of escaping.

The table is no longer loaded at import. get_semantics() reads it on
first use and caches only a valid result, and the resolver imports it
lazily, only for a profile with semantics on. The default ingestion
profile never imports the module, so a missing or corrupt table cannot
break scan, monitor or admin import. Inspection of a prompt graph with
an unusable table is unresolved with the reason "Inspection node
semantics are unavailable" and an error log, rather than a crash.

INSPECTION_PROFILE now has semantics on; no strategy consumes the table
yet, so resolution is unchanged.

* feat(inspect): resolve guider-based samplers

Under INSPECTION_PROFILE the resolver discovers samplers from the
semantics table and follows SamplerCustomAdvanced through its guider
link (Reroutes allowed) to a listed guider:

- CFGGuider: positive and negative, so the pair resolves.
- BasicGuider: positive only. The state is "absent" with the reason
  "Guider has no negative input", the existing missing-negative path.
- Any other guider, including DualCFGGuider (D17), is unsupported-node
  and names that guider.

Guider hops draw visits, scan and depth from the existing budgets. A
SamplerCustomAdvanced upstream in latent ancestry is an earlier stage,
so the result stays multistage-ambiguous. Positive and negative
provenance record guider_id. FaceDetailer (detailer-stage) is not a
candidate yet: deciding it needs output ancestry. DEFAULT_PROFILE never
loads the table and is unchanged.

Vector changes (inspection profile only, default vectors unchanged):
- f07b: no-sampler -> resolved (CFGGuider).
- f17: no-sampler -> unsupported-node (FluxGuidance, Task 2.3).
- f01b: no-sampler -> unsupported-node (EmptyFlux2LatentImage latent,
  Task 2.5).
- f01: no-sampler -> ambiguous (24 SamplerCustomAdvanced branches).

The no-sampler tests (resolver and inspect route) now use a sampler
class the inspector does not know, because f17 has a supported one.

* feat(inspect): trace conditioning through supported pass-through and selector nodes

* feat(inspect): treat detailers as sampler stages

* fix(inspect): choose selectors that share one condition together

* fix(inspect): bound detailer stage chains by the depth limit

* feat(inspect): support common text encoders and string sources

* fix(inspect): keep pair execution evidence behind unreadable string sources

* feat(inspect): accept any non-sampler latent origin

* fix(inspect): queue each node once in breadth-first ancestry walks

The latent and detailer image walks queued every link before checking
whether its node was already seen, and popped from the list head. A dense
shared fan-in grew the queue far past the visit budget before any visit
was charged. Both walks now use a deque and enqueue each node at most
once, charging every examined edge as scanned work; outcomes are
unchanged.

* fix(inspect): treat unlisted pipe and embed samplers as possible stages

The latent and detailer ancestry walks only flagged unlisted nodes with a
linked latent_image, guider, positive or negative input, so easy-use pipe
samplers, Impact pipe detailers and embed-driven video samplers were walked
through and the final sampler's prompt resolved silently. A separate
stage-shaped input set (adding pipes, embeds and custom-sampler parts)
now makes such nodes unsupported-node, named.

* fix(inspect): walk each sampler's latent ancestry once per resolution

Every selector branch run and candidate re-walked the same latent
ancestry, so conditioning-carrying origins such as WanImageToVideo turned
a three-selector graph from ambiguous into work-limit. The walk outcome is
now cached per sampler; branch runs of one candidate pay for it once and
other candidates are charged its visit cost, as the text memo does. Walks
that ran out of work are not cached. Every link input is still walked.

* fix(inspect): treat unlisted model-driven samplers as possible stages

Unlisted samplers that link a model with conditioning or a latent under
other input names (XlabsSampler, generic video samplers) were still walked
through, so the final sampler's prompt resolved silently. An unlisted node
with a linked model plus conditioning, neg_conditioning, samples or latent
is now unsupported-node, named; model patches such as LoraLoader and
ModelSampling nodes are not.

* feat(inspect): compute facts from the resolved sampler

* fix(inspect): merge facts across sampler branches when ambiguous

* fix(inspect): merge facts over unresolved stages and share stage inputs via the table

* feat(inspect): explain why a prompt could not be resolved

* feat(inspect): port legacy parser rules the new resolver missed (PromptManager)

R1: before 3.2.3 a save patch overwrote every PromptManager node's saved
text with the last-run node's prompt. The legacy viewer recognizes the
signature (comfy-metadata.js createContext: two or more PromptManager
workflow nodes with one API text and different widget values). Inspection
now refuses those nodes as malformed instead of resolving to another
node's prompt; the inspector hands the parsed workflow to the resolver for
this check only. Lands before the new pass-throughs (R6) that would
otherwise make these graphs resolve to the wrong text.

R7: this repository's node classes up to 07a5af3 (PromptManagerV2,
Positive, Negative, Detailer, V2Text, PositiveText, NegativeText) resolve
with their own outputs and their exact strip and ", " join.

The default (ingestion) profile ignores both.

* feat(inspect): port legacy parser rules the new resolver missed (A1111)

R3: an accumulating batch saver repeats the A1111 parameters record once
per batch item, identical except "Batch index: N". The bounded PNG reader
now keeps the last copy (Pillow's rule, which #165 relied on) instead of
calling the file unreadable. Any other difference, including a missing or
second batch index, is still a conflict, and decoding the copies draws from
the duplicate role budget.

R4: parameters text that starts with "Negative prompt:" has an empty
positive (#165), instead of showing the delimiter line as the positive.

R5: the settings footer may be followed by sd-dynamic-prompts' one-line
"Template:" and "Negative Template:" records, and may be "Steps: N" alone
when there is no full footer.

R10: commas inside A1111's quoted settings values no longer split them, so
an "ADetailer prompt" with a comma keeps the other facts known.

The facts' A1111 reader mirrors R4, R5 and R10; the default (ingestion)
profile keeps the historical split. Also from the Task 2.7 review: a guard
test fails on any uncoded unresolved reason without a user line (M1), and
the encoder bounds role lines to the client's 512 code units (M4).

* feat(inspect): port legacy parser rules the new resolver missed (installed nodes)

R6 and R9 for nodes whose sources are installed beside ComfyUI, each
entry's input names and output slots read from the node's code (the task
report lists file and line):

- detailer stages UltimateSDUpscale (image), UltimateSDUpscaleNoUpscale
  (upscaled_image) and DetailerForEach (image), judged with their upstream
  samplers like FaceDetailer;
- pass-throughs ControlNetInpaintingAliMamaApply and LTXVConditioning
  (positive 0, negative 1) and FluxKontextMultiReferenceLatentMethod;
- encoder Text to Conditioning, strings TextInput and DisplayText;
- facts model pass-throughs Lora Loader (LoraManager), Power Lora Loader
  (rgthree), ModelPatchTorchSettings, CFGNorm, PerturbedAttentionGuidance.

Impact Pack encodes a detailer's non-empty wildcard instead of its positive
input, so FaceDetailer and DetailerForEach now list it as a prompt
override: a literal wildcard is decided at run time and a linked one names
its source, instead of resolving to the positive input. The overwritten
PromptManager refusal (R1) still holds behind the new pass-throughs. The
default profile does not read the table.

* feat(inspect): port legacy parser rules the new resolver missed (upstream nodes)

R6 and R9 for nodes not installed beside ComfyUI here. Their input names
and output slots come from each pack's source at the commit the saved
workflows record in the node's cnr_id and ver properties (the task report
lists repository, commit, file and line):

- samplers ClownsharKSampler_Beta (RES4LYF), KSampler (Efficient) and
  ttN KSampler_v2 (latent input "latent");
- pass-throughs SeedVarianceEnhancer and ApplyInstantIDAdvanced (positive
  1, negative 2; output 0 is the model);
- selector Switch conditioning [Crystools];
- encoder smZ CLIPTextEncode: its text when with_SDXL is false; when true
  the connected CLIP decides at run time which inputs are read, so the
  prompt is known only when text, text_g and text_l agree;
- strings ttN text, CR Text, CR Prompt Text and TextBoxMira;
- facts model pass-through CR Apply LoRA Stack.

Inputs that replace what a sampler reads are not followed: RES4LYF options
(may carry a guider, and with sigmas replace the settings), an Efficiency
script and a ttN XY plot leave the prompt unsupported and the facts
unresolved. The overwritten PromptManager refusal (R1) still holds behind
SeedVarianceEnhancer. The default profile does not read the table.

* test(inspect): cover batch copies past the role budget and orphan widgets

* fix(inspect): match the batch index only in the settings footer

Review I-1: duplicate A1111 parameters copies were compared after blanking
"Batch index: N" anywhere in the record, so copies whose prompts differ
only by that phrase were accepted. The field is now blanked only inside
the record's one "Steps: N, ..." footer line, which must hold it exactly
once; any other difference stays a conflict.

Review M-4: the inspector parses the workflow record only when the API
graph can show the overwritten-PromptManager signature (a PromptManager
class, or a node with PromptManager's search_text input).

* fix(inspect): refuse overwritten PromptManager text inside subgraphs

Controller ruling on review M-1: PromptManager nodes inside subgraphs run
as "<instance>:<inner>" API IDs, nested instances chaining their IDs. The
overwritten-text check now walks subgraph instances (bounded in depth and
nodes) and reads a text widget stored by name, so these nodes are refused
like top-level ones, anchored or not. A definition without an instance
runs nothing and is ignored.

Review M-5: the historical adapters skip an explicit null prepend or append,
as the 07a5af3 code's "if prepend_text:" did.

* test(inspect): import unittest one way in the inspection suites

Code scanning flagged the mixed 'import unittest' and 'from unittest import
mock' forms. Use 'import unittest' plus 'import unittest.mock' everywhere.

* fix(history): name the recorded run's current-file prompts apart from its frozen fields

Now that the inspector resolves more saved files, the Recorded run dialog can
hold two regions named "Positive prompt" (and two of each Copy/Send action):
the frozen run field and the inline current file's prompt. Assistive
technology could not tell them apart, and the real-host chronology test read
two <pre> elements.

Prompt blocks take an optional context label. The inline current file inside
a recorded run names its regions "Current file positive prompt" and its
actions "Copy/Send current file positive prompt"; the visible headings stay
as in the concept. The real-host test now also scopes its frozen-field reads
to the "Frozen run prompt texts" section, and a disposable-server workflow
pins the distinct names with a resolved current file.

* fix(inspect): drop preview-only stages from unanchored candidates

A stage whose outputs reach only non-file outputs (PreviewImage and the other
non_file_outputs) cannot have written a saved file, yet it stayed an
unanchored candidate, so a preview-only FaceDetailer made the saved branch
ambiguous (f01b).

The inspection profile now drops such stages before detailer absorption,
using two linear backward passes over the graph (charged like the consumer
map; a failed pass keeps every stage). A stage without consumers, or one that
also reaches any other terminal, is kept, and nothing is dropped when every
stage is preview-only. Raw plus detailed double saves both write files and
stay ambiguous. A file in the host temp folder may itself be a preview, so it
is inspected with PREVIEW_INSPECTION_PROFILE, which keeps those stages.

Workspace facts follow the same choice: an absent or unresolved result that
names a sampler merges facts across that sampler's stages only, so the
dropped detailer's settings no longer blur the saved file's facts.

f01b now resolves (absent negative, guider has none); its vector is updated
and the expected failure removed. The default profile is unchanged:
differential against 39dcc40 identical over 160,256 cases. Over 60,054
inspection cases no previously resolved or absent result changed.

* fix(history): name the current file's prompt pair button apart from the frozen run's

The recorded run dialog nests the current-file inspector, whose footer repeated the "Send prompt pair" name. Name it from the prompt context, scope the real-host test to the frozen region, and add a dialog-wide duplicate-name check.
2026-10-19 17:26:37 -07:00

487 lines
19 KiB
Python

"""Non-resolved prompt outcomes carry one short, truthful line per role."""
import ast
import json
import unittest
import unittest.mock
from pathlib import Path
from dataclasses import replace
from utils import prompt_pair_resolver
from utils.inspection_outcomes import (
_UNCODED_LINES,
CLASS_NAME_LENGTH,
REASON_CODES,
outcome_message,
project_resolution,
)
from utils.inspection_response import encode_inspection_response
from utils.prompt_inspector import inspect_prompt_evidence
from utils.prompt_pair_resolver import (
EMPTY_POSITIVE_REASON,
INSPECTION_PROFILE,
MULTISTAGE_UNATTRIBUTED_REASON,
SEMANTICS_UNAVAILABLE_REASON,
)
LIMITS = "Prompt exceeds inspection limits."
def _encode(text: str) -> dict:
return {"class_type": "CLIPTextEncode", "inputs": {"text": text, "clip": ["9", 0]}}
def _latent() -> dict:
return {
"class_type": "EmptyLatentImage",
"inputs": {"width": 8, "height": 8, "batch_size": 1},
}
def _ksampler(positive: str = "7") -> dict:
return {
"class_type": "KSampler",
"inputs": {
"positive": [positive, 0],
"negative": ["6", 0],
"latent_image": ["4", 0],
"model": ["9", 0],
"seed": 1,
"steps": 2,
"cfg": 1.0,
"sampler_name": "euler",
"scheduler": "normal",
"denoise": 1.0,
},
}
def _dual_cfg() -> dict:
return {
"1": _encode("positive"),
"6": _encode("negative"),
"2": {
"class_type": "DualCFGGuider",
"inputs": {
"cond1": ["1", 0],
"cond2": ["1", 0],
"negative": ["6", 0],
"model": ["9", 0],
},
},
"3": {
"class_type": "SamplerCustomAdvanced",
"inputs": {
"guider": ["2", 0],
"noise": ["9", 0],
"sampler": ["9", 0],
"sigmas": ["9", 0],
"latent_image": ["4", 0],
},
},
"4": _latent(),
}
def _runtime() -> dict:
return {
"1": {"class_type": "PromptSearchList", "inputs": {"search": "cat"}},
"7": {
"class_type": "CLIPTextEncode",
"inputs": {"text": ["1", 0], "clip": ["9", 0]},
},
"6": _encode("negative"),
"3": _ksampler(),
"4": _latent(),
}
def _composite() -> dict:
graph = _runtime()
graph["7"] = {
"class_type": "ConditioningCombine",
"inputs": {"conditioning_1": ["6", 0], "conditioning_2": ["8", 0]},
}
graph["8"] = _encode("other")
return graph
def _messages(evidence: dict) -> dict:
return {role: side.get("message") for role, side in evidence["prompts"].items()}
def _statuses(evidence: dict) -> dict:
return {role: side["status"] for role, side in evidence["prompts"].items()}
class TestOutcomeMessages(unittest.TestCase):
def assert_unresolved_with(self, evidence: dict, message: str) -> None:
self.assertEqual(
_statuses(evidence), {"positive": "unresolved", "negative": "unresolved"}
)
self.assertEqual(
_messages(evidence), {"positive": message, "negative": message}
)
def test_unsupported_node_status_names_the_class(self):
evidence = inspect_prompt_evidence({"prompt": _dual_cfg()})
self.assertEqual(evidence["resolution"]["reason_code"], "unsupported-node")
self.assert_unresolved_with(
evidence,
"Prompt uses a node the inspector does not support (DualCFGGuider).",
)
def test_runtime_and_composite_statuses(self):
self.assert_unresolved_with(
inspect_prompt_evidence({"prompt": _runtime()}),
"Prompt is chosen at run time (PromptSearchList).",
)
self.assert_unresolved_with(
inspect_prompt_evidence({"prompt": _composite()}),
"Prompt combines several texts (ConditioningCombine).",
)
def test_limit_status(self):
tight = replace(INSPECTION_PROFILE, per_candidate_visits=1, total_visits=1)
evidence = inspect_prompt_evidence({"prompt": _runtime()}, profile=tight)
self.assertEqual(evidence["resolution"]["reason_code"], "work-limit")
self.assert_unresolved_with(evidence, LIMITS)
for code in ("work-limit", "depth-limit", "text-limit", "graph-ceiling"):
self.assertEqual(
outcome_message({"state": "unresolved", "reason_code": code}), LIMITS
)
def test_every_closed_code_and_known_uncoded_reason_has_a_line(self):
for code in REASON_CODES:
message = outcome_message({"state": "unresolved", "reason_code": code})
self.assertIsInstance(message, str, code)
self.assertTrue(message.endswith("."), code)
self.assertNotIn("could not be resolved", message)
for reason, expected in (
(EMPTY_POSITIVE_REASON, "Positive prompt is empty."),
(
SEMANTICS_UNAVAILABLE_REASON,
"The inspector's node table is unavailable.",
),
(
MULTISTAGE_UNATTRIBUTED_REASON,
"Several sampler stages were found; their prompts were not compared.",
),
(
"Media metadata could not be read",
"Metadata in this file could not be read.",
),
):
resolution = {"state": "unresolved", "reason": reason, "reason_code": None}
self.assertEqual(outcome_message(resolution), expected)
def test_named_codes_without_a_class_omit_the_name(self):
for code, line in (
("unsupported-node", "Prompt uses a node the inspector does not support."),
("runtime-value", "Prompt is chosen at run time."),
("composite", "Prompt combines several texts."),
):
for node in (None, {"id": "7", "class_type": None}):
resolution = {"state": "unresolved", "reason_code": code, "node": node}
self.assertEqual(outcome_message(resolution), line)
def test_class_name_is_bounded(self):
resolution = {
"state": "unresolved",
"reason_code": "unsupported-node",
"node": {"id": "7", "class_type": "N" * 500},
}
self.assertEqual(
outcome_message(resolution),
"Prompt uses a node the inspector does not support "
f"({'N' * CLASS_NAME_LENGTH}).",
)
self.assertEqual(CLASS_NAME_LENGTH, 200)
def test_resolved_ambiguous_absent_and_unknown_outcomes_carry_no_line(self):
for resolution in (
{"state": "resolved", "reason_code": None},
{"state": "ambiguous", "reason_code": "multistage-differs"},
{"state": "ambiguous", "reason_code": None, "reason": "Multiple"},
{"state": "absent", "reason_code": None, "reason": "No parsed"},
{"state": "unresolved", "reason_code": "guess"},
{"state": "unresolved", "reason_code": None, "reason": "Anything else"},
None,
):
self.assertIsNone(outcome_message(resolution), resolution)
def test_inspector_lines_for_no_sampler_malformed_and_empty_positive(self):
evidence = inspect_prompt_evidence({"prompt": {"1": _encode("x")}})
self.assert_unresolved_with(evidence, "No supported sampler was found.")
evidence = inspect_prompt_evidence({"prompt": "not-json"})
self.assert_unresolved_with(
evidence, "Prompt metadata in this file is malformed."
)
graph = _runtime()
graph["7"] = _encode(" ")
evidence = inspect_prompt_evidence({"prompt": graph})
self.assertEqual(evidence["resolution"]["reason"], EMPTY_POSITIVE_REASON)
self.assert_unresolved_with(evidence, "Positive prompt is empty.")
def test_a_resolved_pair_with_an_empty_positive_explains_only_that_role(self):
side = {"text": " ", "provenance": {"text_source": "graph-inferred"}}
negative = {"text": "kept", "provenance": {"text_source": "graph-inferred"}}
resolved = {
"state": "resolved",
"positive": side,
"negative": negative,
"sampler_id": "3",
"reason": "",
"reason_code": None,
"node": None,
}
with unittest.mock.patch(
"utils.prompt_inspector.resolve_prompt_pair", return_value=resolved
):
evidence = inspect_prompt_evidence({"prompt": {}})
self.assertEqual(
evidence["prompts"]["positive"],
{
"status": "unresolved",
"text": None,
"source": None,
"message": "Positive prompt is empty.",
},
)
self.assertEqual(evidence["prompts"]["negative"]["text"], "kept")
self.assertNotIn("message", evidence["prompts"]["negative"])
def test_candidates_and_absence_keep_their_status_lines(self):
graph = _runtime()
graph["7"] = _encode("positive")
graph["5"] = _ksampler()
evidence = inspect_prompt_evidence({"prompt": graph})
self.assertEqual(evidence["resolution"]["state"], "ambiguous")
self.assertEqual(_messages(evidence), {"positive": None, "negative": None})
evidence = inspect_prompt_evidence({})
self.assertEqual(_messages(evidence), {"positive": None, "negative": None})
graph = _runtime()
graph["7"] = _encode("positive")
evidence = inspect_prompt_evidence({"prompt": graph})
self.assertEqual(evidence["resolution"]["state"], "resolved")
self.assertEqual(_messages(evidence), {"positive": None, "negative": None})
class TestResolutionProjection(unittest.TestCase):
def test_closed_codes_and_named_nodes_pass_unchanged(self):
for code in REASON_CODES:
resolution = {
"state": "unresolved",
"sampler_id": "3",
"reason": "r",
"reason_code": code,
"node": None,
}
self.assertEqual(project_resolution(resolution), resolution)
named = {
"state": "unresolved",
"sampler_id": None,
"reason": "r",
"reason_code": "composite",
"node": {"id": "7", "class_type": None},
}
self.assertEqual(project_resolution(named), named)
def test_unknown_codes_and_unbounded_nodes_fail_closed(self):
base = {"state": "unresolved", "sampler_id": None, "reason": "r"}
for code, node in (
("guess", None),
(1, None),
("malformed", {"id": "7", "class_type": "X"}),
(None, {"id": "7", "class_type": "X"}),
("unsupported-node", {"id": 7, "class_type": "X"}),
("unsupported-node", {"id": "", "class_type": "X"}),
("unsupported-node", {"id": "7"}),
("unsupported-node", {"id": "7", "class_type": 7}),
("unsupported-node", {"id": "7", "class_type": "X", "extra": 1}),
("unsupported-node", "X"),
):
projected = project_resolution({**base, "reason_code": code, "node": node})
self.assertIsNone(projected["node"], (code, node))
if code not in REASON_CODES:
self.assertIsNone(projected["reason_code"], code)
for state in ("resolved", "absent"):
projected = project_resolution(
{**base, "state": state, "reason_code": "work-limit", "node": None}
)
self.assertIsNone(projected["reason_code"])
long_name = project_resolution(
{
**base,
"reason_code": "runtime-value",
"node": {"id": "7" * 300, "class_type": "N" * 300},
}
)["node"]
self.assertEqual(
long_name, {"id": "7" * CLASS_NAME_LENGTH, "class_type": "N" * 200}
)
unnamed = project_resolution(
{
**base,
"reason_code": "composite",
"node": {"id": "7", "class_type": ""},
}
)["node"]
self.assertEqual(unnamed, {"id": "7", "class_type": None})
def test_wire_carries_role_lines_and_projected_resolution(self):
evidence = inspect_prompt_evidence({"prompt": _dual_cfg()})
resolution = dict(evidence["resolution"], reason_code="guess")
body = json.loads(
encode_inspection_response(
image={"root_index": 0, "path": "a.png", "filename": "a.png"},
root_scope="a" * 64,
file={
"observation": "current-file",
"source_label": "output",
"media_type": "image",
"extension": ".png",
"size": 1,
"modified_time": 1,
},
prompts=evidence["prompts"],
resolution=resolution,
inspection=None,
library={"status": "none", "tags": []},
)
)
self.assertEqual(body["prompts"], evidence["prompts"])
self.assertIsNone(body["resolution"]["reason_code"])
self.assertIsNone(body["resolution"]["node"])
# Uncoded unresolved reasons only the default (ingestion) profile emits; the
# inspector never shows them, so they need no line.
_DEFAULT_PROFILE_ONLY = frozenset(
{"Cyclic or excessive latent ancestry", "Resolution limit reached"}
)
def _uncoded_unresolved_reasons() -> set:
"""Every literal reason the resolver can return as unresolved without a code.
Reads the source: ``_Unresolved(reason)`` without a code, and
``_result("unresolved", ..., reason=...)`` without ``reason_code``. A reason
is a string literal or a module constant naming one.
"""
source = Path(prompt_pair_resolver.__file__).read_text(encoding="utf-8")
tree = ast.parse(source)
def literal(node):
if isinstance(node, ast.Constant) and isinstance(node.value, str):
return node.value
if isinstance(node, ast.Name):
value = getattr(prompt_pair_resolver, node.id, None)
return value if isinstance(value, str) else None
return None
found = set()
for node in ast.walk(tree):
if not isinstance(node, ast.Call) or not isinstance(node.func, ast.Name):
continue
keywords = {item.arg: item.value for item in node.keywords}
if node.func.id == "_Unresolved":
if len(node.args) < 2 and "code" not in keywords and node.args:
reason = literal(node.args[0])
if reason is None:
raise AssertionError(f"line {node.lineno}: unreadable reason")
found.add(reason)
elif node.func.id == "_result" and node.args:
state = literal(node.args[0])
coded = "reason_code" in keywords or len(node.args) > 6
reason = keywords.get(
"reason", node.args[4] if len(node.args) > 4 else None
)
if state == "unresolved" and not coded and reason is not None:
text = literal(reason)
if text is None:
raise AssertionError(f"line {node.lineno}: unreadable reason")
found.add(text)
return found
class TestEveryUncodedOutcomeHasALine(unittest.TestCase):
"""Task 2.7 review M1: a new uncoded unresolved reason fails here."""
def test_resolver_reasons_without_a_code_have_a_line(self):
reasons = _uncoded_unresolved_reasons()
self.assertIn(EMPTY_POSITIVE_REASON, reasons, "the scan sees the source")
missing = reasons - set(_UNCODED_LINES) - _DEFAULT_PROFILE_ONLY
self.assertEqual(missing, set(), "add a code or a line in inspection_outcomes")
# The allowance names only reasons the source still emits.
self.assertLessEqual(_DEFAULT_PROFILE_ONLY, reasons)
def test_default_profile_only_reasons_are_coded_in_inspection(self):
# The limit outcome is uncoded only on the default profile.
source = {"prompt": {"1": {"class_type": "KSampler", "inputs": {}}}}
for limited in ({"max_depth": 0}, {"max_text_length": 0}):
with self.subTest(**limited):
default = prompt_pair_resolver.resolve_prompt_pair(source, **limited)
inspected = prompt_pair_resolver.resolve_prompt_pair(
source, profile=INSPECTION_PROFILE, **limited
)
self.assertEqual(default["reason"], "Resolution limit reached")
self.assertIsNone(default["reason_code"])
self.assertEqual(inspected["reason"], "Resolution limit reached")
self.assertIsNotNone(inspected["reason_code"])
class TestRoleMessageBound(unittest.TestCase):
"""Task 2.7 review M4: the encoder bounds role lines as the client does."""
def encode(self, prompts: dict) -> dict:
return json.loads(
encode_inspection_response(
image={"root_index": 0, "path": "a.png", "filename": "a.png"},
root_scope="a" * 64,
file={
"observation": "current-file",
"source_label": "output",
"media_type": "image",
"extension": ".png",
"size": 1,
"modified_time": 1,
},
prompts=prompts,
resolution={"state": "unresolved", "reason": "x"},
inspection=None,
library={"status": "none", "tags": []},
)
)["prompts"]
def test_role_messages_are_bounded_text_on_unresolved_roles(self):
side = {"status": "unresolved", "text": None, "source": None}
prompts = self.encode(
{
"positive": {**side, "message": "x" * 600},
"negative": {**side, "message": "\U0001f600" * 300},
}
)
self.assertEqual(prompts["positive"]["message"], "x" * 512)
# The client counts UTF-16 code units.
self.assertLessEqual(
len(prompts["negative"]["message"].encode("utf-16-le")), 1024
)
self.assertEqual(prompts["negative"]["message"], "\U0001f600" * 256)
for message in ("", None, 7):
with self.subTest(message=message):
prompts = self.encode(
{"positive": {**side, "message": message}, "negative": side}
)
self.assertNotIn("message", prompts["positive"])
resolved = {"status": "resolved", "text": "a", "source": "graph-inferred"}
prompts = self.encode(
{"positive": {**resolved, "message": "line"}, "negative": side}
)
self.assertNotIn("message", prompts["positive"])
self.assertEqual(prompts["negative"], side)
if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main()