* fix(review): anchor files on their saver in the scan and Needs review (#390)
The scan and Apply now resolve with the file's name, as the workspace
inspector does since #383, so the one saver whose filename_prefix names
the file anchors its branch. A file whose branch that anchor resolves is
never queued (from the inspection profile it offers no choice; a
default-ambiguous file asks saver_anchored) and its pending, undecided
items leave on the next scan. REVIEW_RULE_VERSION is folded into
inspection item versions so old items are re-evaluated. No match, several
matches or an unfinished walk anchor nothing. Apply refuses a choice the
anchor contradicts.
* fix(review): refuse a default choice the saver anchor contradicts (#390)
Apply re-resolves a default item with the file's name: when its saver
anchors the branch, no candidate is offered and the choice is refused.
The scan's anchor check skips bytes carrying a decision and remembers
unanchored file states per process, so a rescan does not inspect an
unchanged file again.
* fix(review): queue an anchored file with its saver's pair as the choice (#390)
Maintainer ruling: a file never falls through both the link and the
queue. When only the saver anchor resolves a file the default profile and
the parser floor leave unlinked, the scan queues it with the anchor's pair
as its one candidate (evidence anchor: saver), never linking it. Files
already linked or resolved by the default path are unchanged. Apply
accepts the anchored pair when the bytes now resolve to it, and an
anchored item is a choice the untraced settle keeps.
* fix(review): upgrade old default items of anchored files, tag anchored results (#390)
A pending default item recorded before the saver anchor no longer
shortcuts the rescan when only the anchor resolves the file: the
anchored item supersedes it. Apply accepts a resolved re-resolution only
when it is tagged as the saver anchor's, the anchored pair must carry a
positive text to choose, and limited anchored evidence still counts as a
choice. TESTING.md describes the ruling.
Vito
534c95248a