10 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Bruno Madeira 7f728e17be fix LatentMakeSeamlessSB; remove seed from arguments; update SP workflows; rename some workflows.
reasoning behind seed removal in SP nodes: the cases where seed changes output are so rare that will just confuse the users and occupy unnecessary space in the workflow.
2024-08-26 22:52:53 +01:00
Bruno Madeira e8298ce1a9 fix typo - workflow name should use same abbreviation as the node's name & documentation. 2024-08-26 22:05:31 +01:00
Bruno Madeira 14ed52b067 update workflows (only to keep images consistent with the output, the workflows remain unchanged) 2024-08-24 17:12:35 +01:00
Bruno Madeira 264aae6f39 added new workflow for seamless latent + renamed existing workflow 2024-08-21 23:12:32 +01:00
Bruno Madeira 4a6244dcc8 replace advanced seamless setup.png.
previous workflow is unnecessarily complicated, the new one is better and simpler.
2024-08-21 21:13:18 +01:00
Bruno Madeira fc173c2713 update basic workflows ( breaks documentation, to be fixed later) 2024-08-20 23:52:15 +01:00
Bruno Madeira 9b7a73f7b2 add note and src res to advanced workflow.
* I feel like I've tried to solve the patch edges before differently; can't recall... hmm...
2024-08-10 21:04:34 +01:00
Bruno Madeira 3687c1a0a4 added 3 new example workflows and the textures used as input 2024-08-09 23:38:08 +01:00
Bruno Madeira 902395122e Update README.md & workflow images - add new version argument.
_______________________________
DevNote
a thought just occurred to me, of a likely blunder in nice block size.
there should, at the very minimum, be an addressable area of size equal to the lowest "best" multiple; and the bigger the addressable area the more variation allowed. Therefore, instead of aiming for a highest multiple to maximize performance, I should take this into consideration and further limit the maximum possible value, or define some criteria to better balance the decision.
2024-08-07 23:04:45 +01:00
Bruno Madeira 1964ded5a4 add workflow examples. 2024-05-23 22:49:45 +01:00