Two pieces of the "port v4's exact UI onto v5's backend" plan:
- core/contract.py: new optional ModuleSpec.category field (closed set:
continuity, guidance, conditioning, sampling, post, system), validated in
core/schema.py, threaded through core/registry.py's FIELDS and
to_manifest(). Presentation grouping, independent of STAGE (execution
order) -- a module can be stage="sampling" and category="guidance" at
once. Only the 4 existing modules that actually render a settings panel
(alg, sharpen, appearance, full_control) got a category assigned; the
other 12 have none to categorize (no SETTINGS block) and stay
uncategorised, which is valid.
- v4's frontend (movie_editor/frontend/*, ~29k lines, 61 files) copied
verbatim into app/legacy/. core/routes.py's "/" route now serves
legacy/index.html instead of the composer entry point; a <base> tag in
that file resolves its own relative script/link tags against
/funpack/app/legacy/ regardless of what URL it's served at, so every
file moved as a unit with zero per-file path edits. Verified live: all
61 assets load 200 OK, the real v4 onboarding screen renders pixel-for-
pixel (it's the actual DOM/CSS, not a reimplementation), and several v4
API calls (/api/media, /api/projects, /api/git/status) already succeed
against v5's real backend by coincidence of shared route naming -- the
rest 404/405 as expected, since api.js's ~90 functions haven't been
rewired to v5's actual routes yet (next piece of this plan).
The old composer entry point (app/index.html, app/composer/**) stays in
the tree, unreferenced, until a later cleanup pass once nothing imports it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A module's OWN default could be NaN or infinite. The override path refused
one and the declaration path did not -- and a default is the value most runs
use, because a setting nobody names never reaches the override check at all.
So the fault this project has already been bitten by, `sigma > nan` false at
every step and a modifier silently doing nothing, was reachable through the
one door that was never checked. Bounds too: an infinite min or max makes the
range check meaningless in one direction.
And two slots could share an id. The check for what exists was a set, which
cannot see a duplicate, so building the prompt by id overwrote one slot with
the other: a node silently missing from the queued graph, or one left reading
its own output. Refused now, before anything else is reported, because ids
are how a link names what feeds it and every later check is meaningless while
two slots answer to one name.
Both were found by attacking the whole tree rather than the diff, and both
are in code that already had tests -- the tests exercised the neighbouring
door in each case.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
One declaration does three jobs: renders the panel, carries the defaults, names
the values that come back. A module writes no DOM and reads no DOM.
Validation refuses rather than repairs -- unknown type, a renderer its type does
not have, a label that is not text, a default outside its own bounds, a when
naming a key the module never declared. A module that is wrong does not get a
best-effort panel; it does not load, and says why once.
Ordering is by declared relation and stage, never priority numbers, and a cycle
drops only the modules in it. Compatibility is by trait, never model name.
The shell hands a module { composer, values, on, shell } and nothing else: no
node, no document, no kit internals. It cannot style anything because it is
never given anything that could.
catalogue/hide.html puts one good module and five broken ones through the real
shell and shows the result: one panel, five absent, no placeholders. The lint
fixtures make the scanner prove it catches each rule, so a clean scan means
something.
First slice: modules/system/appearance. Two settings, an optional ui.js, and
clicking Light actually turns the app light.
Claude