Two real findings from adversarial review of the previous commit (the v4
UI port's route change), both fixed:
- app/tests-layout/*.spec.js (20 files, 133 tests): every one of these
navigated to /funpack/ and asserted on composer-specific DOM
(.cx-workspace*, window.FunPack) that no longer exists there now that
the ported v4 frontend is served at that URL instead. Left as-is they
would silently time out on every run. Each file now carries an explicit
test.skip(true, "...") with a comment explaining why and pointing at
the plan's pixel-exactness step, which is what will eventually rewrite
these against the new DOM -- declared and tracked, not quietly broken.
- core/tests/test_registry.py's fixture-based tests never exercised the
new category field through the real announcement_of()/scan() path --
only test_schema.py's direct validate() calls did, which bypass
registry.py's FIELDS name-mapping entirely. A typo there (e.g.
"Category" instead of "CATEGORY") would have passed every existing
test. The "good module" fixture gained CATEGORY = "guidance" and
test_the_good_module_loads now asserts on it, closing the gap.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The naming of a node happened outside the guard: getattr's default is
evaluated eagerly, so a class that raises in __repr__ threw before the try
and cost every other module its nodes -- which ComfyUI reports as the whole
pack failing.
`get("nodes") or []` repaired a typo into "ships no nodes". Absent is none;
0 is a mistake, and this file refuses rather than repairs. Same for the id
lists.
A probe by bare class name matches Attention or Block from any architecture,
so a dotted name now requires the defining module too.
And the fixture that claimed a duplicate id sorted BEFORE the good one, so
every test asserting "the good node was collected" was satisfied by the
lookalike. The tests now assert identity, and the duplicate is made to lose.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ComfyUI's V3 entrypoint replaces NODE_CLASS_MAPPINGS, which must not exist
at all: nodes.py checks it first and reaches comfy_entrypoint only in an
elif, so an empty dict registers nothing and reports no error.
A module declares NODES for graph structure and SETTINGS for preferences,
and the two never mix -- a saved workflow stores class_type and input
names, so letting a new setting add a socket would rot existing graphs.
Traits now come from two places: facts core can read off any model, and
providers announced by a model's own module. Core names no model, so
supporting a new one is a folder rather than an edit here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
One declaration does three jobs: renders the panel, carries the defaults, names
the values that come back. A module writes no DOM and reads no DOM.
Validation refuses rather than repairs -- unknown type, a renderer its type does
not have, a label that is not text, a default outside its own bounds, a when
naming a key the module never declared. A module that is wrong does not get a
best-effort panel; it does not load, and says why once.
Ordering is by declared relation and stage, never priority numbers, and a cycle
drops only the modules in it. Compatibility is by trait, never model name.
The shell hands a module { composer, values, on, shell } and nothing else: no
node, no document, no kit internals. It cannot style anything because it is
never given anything that could.
catalogue/hide.html puts one good module and five broken ones through the real
shell and shows the result: one panel, five absent, no placeholders. The lint
fixtures make the scanner prove it catches each rule, so a clean scan means
something.
First slice: modules/system/appearance. Two settings, an optional ui.js, and
clicking Light actually turns the app light.
