The layout was assembled by hand and read like it. Measured at 1440x900:
the three columns started at three different heights, a panel head was 41px
when it held a control and 34 when it did not, the gap left of the centre
was 7px and right of it 19, the properties column sat 11px further in than
the others inside a border that meant nothing, and five controls in one
list had four different widths -- a <select> takes the width of its widest
option, so the row listing checkpoint filenames was 124px wider than its
neighbours.
Now: --gutter is the space between regions, between two panels stacked in
a column, and inside the bands; the head band height is the panel head
height is the collapsible head height; --control-col gives every settings
control the same two edges. The frame's bands run edge to edge and the
content is inset by the gutter, so the app has an outline instead of a
margin that changed per region.
Also here, all of it visible in the same screenshot:
* The status sat against the Generate button with 1300px of empty bar to
its left -- everything was in one right-aligned group. What the app says
is at the start of the row now, what you press is at the end.
* A panel body is a column with a gap: two things put in it by two parts
of the app had whatever space their line boxes happened to leave.
* A container query adds no specificity, so the narrow-panel rule written
above the rules it overrides lost -- and flex-basis in a column is
HEIGHT, which turned four settings into a panel two screens long.
* The theme you picked was thrown away on every load: the appearance
module applied its own declared default over the choice the page had
already applied from storage. It adopts the live value now, and a panel
is built after setup so its control shows what setup settled on.
The prompt was a slot input on a CLIPTextEncode, reachable only by opening
the pipeline window and finding the node. A slot can now say that one of
its inputs belongs on the app's surface -- a place and a label -- and the
shell offers a region with that name or does not, exactly as a module's
panel works. Core validates that a role is names and nothing else.
Values for those inputs travel addressed by slot rather than as a whole
pipeline, so the window that owns the structure and a box that owns one
value cannot disagree about the slots between them. An address that is
not there is refused: a prompt typed into a box for a removed slot has
gone nowhere, and a run that starts anyway is not the run that was asked
for.
Region stand-ins are empty states now, taken down once something mounts --
'modules appear here' left above the modules that appeared explained
nothing to nobody.
A module whose setup() threw was reported as hidden with its panel already on
screen -- appended one line too early. The file states the opposite guarantee.
A redraw destroyed every control and then rebuilt, so a row revealed by another
value -- one the first build never rendered and so never checked -- stripped
the panel and threw on the way to refilling it. Building first makes a redraw
as safe as the first build already was.
A page loaded at a narrow width recorded the panel its own one-at-a-time rule
had just closed as one the user wanted closed, so widening brought back only
the left. What the user chose is now kept apart from what is on screen.
The redraw test counted rows and passed against the bug; a control removed from
a row leaves the row behind. It counts controls.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>