'Awful' / 'Wrong appearance' banked on intrusion semantics; now any rating
whose profile reward marks the run a bad OUTCOME (<= -0.25: Missing
quality, Missing details+quality, Missing action+quality, Missing
details+action+quality) also feeds the negative bank - degradation is
visible in the latent, so steering off that attractor is meaningful.
Near-miss ratings with positive reward (Missing details +0.35, Missing
action +0.05) stay excluded: those latents are mostly-wanted content and
banking them would repel future runs from material the user asked for.
Decision moves into negative_memory.is_negative_profile (intrusion keys OR
reward threshold, robust to future profiles); promoted entries now carry
the rating key as provenance for severity-weighted steering later.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
