4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
speedyrulzandClaude Fable 5.1 44cfb46a72 fix: settle unacknowledged submissions by asking the worker about the run itself
Second round of review follow-ups for the next-free-GPU dispatcher.

Ambiguous acceptance is no longer inferred from aggregate queue depth. The
dispatcher asks the worker about the specific run: a prompt carrying one
of its job ids in the worker's running or pending queue, or in its recent
history, means the run was accepted and its result is collected (or
reported) there; only after consecutive checks find no trace of it is the
original prompt restored. A worker that cannot be asked keeps the run on
hold. The same question decides when a held delegate prompt must be queued
because the worker finished (or lost) the run without delivering.

An eagerly dispatched run whose acknowledgement was lost is now collected
after the worker delivers: the record remembers that no master prompt was
ever queued for it, so acceptance queues its collector instead of treating
it like a collector that is already executing.

Cancellation now reaches the queue-insertion boundary: queue_prompt_payload
takes an insert_if guard that is checked under the queue mutex right before
the item is put, after validation has yielded. The delegate requeue passes
the run's cancellation flag, so a clear or delete that lands during
validation refuses the insertion instead of being discovered afterwards.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-20 19:50:59 -04:00
Robert Wojciechowski c30036ae31 feat: preserve required output utilities in image-list execution 2026-10-13 23:26:25 +00:00
Robert Wojciechowski 0e9ee7fbac test: make async helper regression portable 2026-04-07 23:39:18 +00:00
Robert Wojciechowski 5386de10e3 fix: include queue metadata timestamps 2026-04-07 23:34:15 +00:00