The two example sections were written from the inside of the graph: node class
names, the `<image1>` / `<image2>` notation, which loader to point where, and an
aside about which of the two 2.1 encoders keeps alpha. None of that helps
someone deciding whether to try the example.
Both sections now say what a user does and what comes back, in two sentences
each, and the news lines and the Updates entry follow. Example 31 also gains the
Workflow JSON link it was missing.
The MarkdownNote embedded in the Example 32 workflow gets the same treatment:
it keeps `<image1>` / `<image2>` (the instruction needs those) and drops the
`Join Image With Alpha` / `Load Image` MASK-output explanation.
The result image is byte-identical to the committed one; only the embedded
workflow metadata changed, which is why nothing was re-run.
scraed
2d7912f9a5
