The five review findings of 2026-10-24 for phase P6:
1. Gate 2 (`ruff check .`) was RED on the P6 tree: F841 - the local `size`
of `_anchor_in` in tools/render_workflow_preview.py:95 was assigned but
never used, so the lint job of .github/workflows/tests.yml would have
gone red on this branch. The unused local is gone; the render output is
unchanged (the regenerated png has the same sha256 as the committed
one). The gate was recorded as "not runnable" although ruff IS
installed on this machine (0.15.22; the CI pin 0.8.6 reproduces it via
`uvx ruff@0.8.6`) - the embedded env is only one of the environments.
The gate records (audit D6, the progress doc, the status doc, the plan)
now state the truth.
2. The per-node parameter tables of the README were not checked by any
test, although the README calls the widget names, the defaults, the
ranges and the order compatibility guarantees. tools/docs_tables.py
renders what a V3 schema says (documented_parameters) and
test_the_parameter_tables_of_the_readme_match_the_node_schemas compares
the README with it. The check is mutation-checked: a wrong
`max_clip_length` default/range, a wrong `final_upscale_factor` range,
a wrong `only_center_face` default and two swapped widget rows each
fail the test (the values in the README are correct - the gap was the
coverage).
3. tools/docs_tables.py carried REPO_FILE_EXTENSIONS and
EXTERNAL_PATH_ROOTS without using them while the test re-defined them.
The test imports both from tools/docs_tables.py now - one copy, no
drift between the generator and the checker.
4. The rendered preview of the sequence workflow was never shown in the
README (only the shipped workflow's preview was). The README shows
example_workflows/keep-sequence-workflow.png in the Example workflows
section, captioned as a rendered graph diagram and not a screenshot.
5. The committed progress doc called its own review file untracked and
"stays uncommitted" although it is committed (0066001, 185c289). The
gate-7 row names `.dev` as the only untracked path now.
Checks (run on 2026-10-24): ruff check . -> All checks passed! (0.15.22)
and uvx ruff@0.8.6 check . -> All checks passed! (the version CI pins);
pytest -q -m "unit or mock_integration or headless" -> 262 passed, 6
skipped, 5 deselected; pytest -q tests/test_structure.py -> 21 passed;
pytest -q tests/test_example_workflows.py tests/test_docs_claims.py
tests/test_examples_dir.py -> 29 passed; pytest -q -m gpu_acceptance -rs
-> 5 skipped (opt-in); the headless tier against the real ComfyUI source
-> 4 passed, 1 failed (the pre-existing D5 mock-fidelity failure - P6
touched neither conftest.py nor that test).
WildAi