chore(beacon): stub 4 specs for ux-and-install epic; archive logging-modernisation
Audit confirmed all 15 epic criteria are unowned. Four stubs created: 002-manager-compatible-install 003-formatstring-frontend-ux 004-node-logic-correctness 005-metadata-cleanup logging-modernisation archived (1/1 specs shipped). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
James Veitch
co-authored by
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6
parent
61918e7436
commit
1a42a2a0b2
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# Epic: Logging Modernisation
|
||||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
Done — completed 2026-06-28
|
||||
|
||||
## Why now
|
||||
Issue #4 from a community user reports 8 lines of console output per keystroke in the template field. The root cause is a hardcoded `logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)` at module level combined with diagnostic `print()` blocks that were never removed after the FormatString output-order fix. Left unaddressed this makes the nodes unusable in production ComfyUI sessions. This is also a correctness issue: a library must never configure its own log level or add handlers — that violates the Python logging best-practice contract.
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependencies
|
||||
_None._
|
||||
|
||||
## Specs
|
||||
<!-- populated by beacon link-spec -->
|
||||
|
||||
- specs/001-standardise-logging/
|
||||
## ADRs
|
||||
|
||||
- [ADR-001](../../ADRs/ADR-001-stdlib-logging-over-console-libraries.md) — stdlib logging over colored console libraries
|
||||
- [ADR-002](../../ADRs/ADR-002-nullhandler-pattern-for-library-loggers.md) — NullHandler pattern for library loggers
|
||||
|
||||
## Success criteria
|
||||
- [x] `logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)` removed from all modules; log level controlled entirely by the host (ComfyUI or the user's logging config)
|
||||
- [x] `logging.NullHandler()` added to the package root logger in `__init__.py`
|
||||
- [x] All diagnostic `print()` calls converted to `logger.debug()` / `logger.info()` / `logger.error()` as appropriate
|
||||
- [x] `colorama`, `termcolor`, and `rich` removed from runtime dependencies in `pyproject.toml` (they are only used for the now-deleted console-print logging)
|
||||
- [x] A normal ComfyUI run produces zero output from this package unless the host enables DEBUG
|
||||
- [x] Errors (template render failures, file-save failures, interrupt triggers) still surface at `ERROR` / `INFO` level
|
||||
- [x] All existing tests pass; no new test failures introduced
|
||||
|
||||
## Non-goals
|
||||
- Not adding a user-facing log-level toggle inside ComfyUI's UI
|
||||
- Not changing node behaviour, output structure, or ComfyUI API contracts
|
||||
- Not adding structured/JSON logging
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
The `IS_CHANGED` and `update_widget` methods fire on every keystroke via the JS → aiohttp route. Any log call at INFO or above in these hot paths will be visible to the user. All calls in these hot paths must be DEBUG or removed.
|
||||
@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ _None — this epic is self-contained and can start immediately._
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- populated by beacon link-spec -->
|
||||
|
||||
- specs/002-manager-compatible-install-requirements-txt-and-custom-node-list-registration/
|
||||
- specs/003-formatstring-frontend-ux-debounce-connection-migration-node-id-parity-toast-feedback/
|
||||
- specs/004-node-logic-correctness-per-instance-formatstring-schema-randomchoice-determinism-circuitbreaker-any-type/
|
||||
- specs/005-metadata-cleanup-pyproject-description-scripts-dead-code-removal-tooltips-category-consistency/
|
||||
## ADRs
|
||||
|
||||
_To be recorded as cross-cutting decisions are made during DESIGN._
|
||||
|
||||
+1
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
epic = "ux-and-install"
|
||||
+131
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
|
||||
# Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]
|
||||
|
||||
**Feature Branch**: `[###-feature-name]`
|
||||
|
||||
**Created**: [DATE]
|
||||
|
||||
**Status**: Draft
|
||||
|
||||
**Input**: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"
|
||||
|
||||
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
IMPORTANT: User stories should be PRIORITIZED as user journeys ordered by importance.
|
||||
Each user story/journey must be INDEPENDENTLY TESTABLE - meaning if you implement just ONE of them,
|
||||
you should still have a viable MVP (Minimum Viable Product) that delivers value.
|
||||
|
||||
Assign priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.) to each story, where P1 is the most critical.
|
||||
Think of each story as a standalone slice of functionality that can be:
|
||||
- Developed independently
|
||||
- Tested independently
|
||||
- Deployed independently
|
||||
- Demonstrated to users independently
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
2. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority]
|
||||
|
||||
### Edge Cases
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right edge cases.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
- What happens when [boundary condition]?
|
||||
- How does system handle [error scenario]?
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right functional requirements.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### Functional Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- **FR-001**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"]
|
||||
- **FR-002**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"]
|
||||
- **FR-003**: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"]
|
||||
- **FR-004**: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"]
|
||||
- **FR-005**: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"]
|
||||
|
||||
*Example of marking unclear requirements:*
|
||||
|
||||
- **FR-006**: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?]
|
||||
- **FR-007**: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
|
||||
|
||||
- **[Entity 1]**: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation]
|
||||
- **[Entity 2]**: [What it represents, relationships to other entities]
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: Define measurable success criteria.
|
||||
These must be technology-agnostic and measurable.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### Measurable Outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
- **SC-001**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"]
|
||||
- **SC-002**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"]
|
||||
- **SC-003**: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"]
|
||||
- **SC-004**: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]
|
||||
|
||||
## Assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right assumptions based on reasonable defaults
|
||||
chosen when the feature description did not specify certain details.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
- [Assumption about target users, e.g., "Users have stable internet connectivity"]
|
||||
- [Assumption about scope boundaries, e.g., "Mobile support is out of scope for v1"]
|
||||
- [Assumption about data/environment, e.g., "Existing authentication system will be reused"]
|
||||
- [Dependency on existing system/service, e.g., "Requires access to the existing user profile API"]
|
||||
+1
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
epic = "ux-and-install"
|
||||
+131
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
|
||||
# Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]
|
||||
|
||||
**Feature Branch**: `[###-feature-name]`
|
||||
|
||||
**Created**: [DATE]
|
||||
|
||||
**Status**: Draft
|
||||
|
||||
**Input**: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"
|
||||
|
||||
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
IMPORTANT: User stories should be PRIORITIZED as user journeys ordered by importance.
|
||||
Each user story/journey must be INDEPENDENTLY TESTABLE - meaning if you implement just ONE of them,
|
||||
you should still have a viable MVP (Minimum Viable Product) that delivers value.
|
||||
|
||||
Assign priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.) to each story, where P1 is the most critical.
|
||||
Think of each story as a standalone slice of functionality that can be:
|
||||
- Developed independently
|
||||
- Tested independently
|
||||
- Deployed independently
|
||||
- Demonstrated to users independently
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
2. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority]
|
||||
|
||||
### Edge Cases
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right edge cases.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
- What happens when [boundary condition]?
|
||||
- How does system handle [error scenario]?
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right functional requirements.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### Functional Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- **FR-001**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"]
|
||||
- **FR-002**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"]
|
||||
- **FR-003**: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"]
|
||||
- **FR-004**: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"]
|
||||
- **FR-005**: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"]
|
||||
|
||||
*Example of marking unclear requirements:*
|
||||
|
||||
- **FR-006**: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?]
|
||||
- **FR-007**: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
|
||||
|
||||
- **[Entity 1]**: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation]
|
||||
- **[Entity 2]**: [What it represents, relationships to other entities]
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: Define measurable success criteria.
|
||||
These must be technology-agnostic and measurable.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### Measurable Outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
- **SC-001**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"]
|
||||
- **SC-002**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"]
|
||||
- **SC-003**: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"]
|
||||
- **SC-004**: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]
|
||||
|
||||
## Assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right assumptions based on reasonable defaults
|
||||
chosen when the feature description did not specify certain details.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
- [Assumption about target users, e.g., "Users have stable internet connectivity"]
|
||||
- [Assumption about scope boundaries, e.g., "Mobile support is out of scope for v1"]
|
||||
- [Assumption about data/environment, e.g., "Existing authentication system will be reused"]
|
||||
- [Dependency on existing system/service, e.g., "Requires access to the existing user profile API"]
|
||||
+1
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
epic = "ux-and-install"
|
||||
+131
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
|
||||
# Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]
|
||||
|
||||
**Feature Branch**: `[###-feature-name]`
|
||||
|
||||
**Created**: [DATE]
|
||||
|
||||
**Status**: Draft
|
||||
|
||||
**Input**: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"
|
||||
|
||||
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
IMPORTANT: User stories should be PRIORITIZED as user journeys ordered by importance.
|
||||
Each user story/journey must be INDEPENDENTLY TESTABLE - meaning if you implement just ONE of them,
|
||||
you should still have a viable MVP (Minimum Viable Product) that delivers value.
|
||||
|
||||
Assign priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.) to each story, where P1 is the most critical.
|
||||
Think of each story as a standalone slice of functionality that can be:
|
||||
- Developed independently
|
||||
- Tested independently
|
||||
- Deployed independently
|
||||
- Demonstrated to users independently
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
2. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority]
|
||||
|
||||
### Edge Cases
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right edge cases.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
- What happens when [boundary condition]?
|
||||
- How does system handle [error scenario]?
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right functional requirements.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### Functional Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- **FR-001**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"]
|
||||
- **FR-002**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"]
|
||||
- **FR-003**: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"]
|
||||
- **FR-004**: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"]
|
||||
- **FR-005**: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"]
|
||||
|
||||
*Example of marking unclear requirements:*
|
||||
|
||||
- **FR-006**: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?]
|
||||
- **FR-007**: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
|
||||
|
||||
- **[Entity 1]**: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation]
|
||||
- **[Entity 2]**: [What it represents, relationships to other entities]
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: Define measurable success criteria.
|
||||
These must be technology-agnostic and measurable.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### Measurable Outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
- **SC-001**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"]
|
||||
- **SC-002**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"]
|
||||
- **SC-003**: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"]
|
||||
- **SC-004**: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]
|
||||
|
||||
## Assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right assumptions based on reasonable defaults
|
||||
chosen when the feature description did not specify certain details.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
- [Assumption about target users, e.g., "Users have stable internet connectivity"]
|
||||
- [Assumption about scope boundaries, e.g., "Mobile support is out of scope for v1"]
|
||||
- [Assumption about data/environment, e.g., "Existing authentication system will be reused"]
|
||||
- [Dependency on existing system/service, e.g., "Requires access to the existing user profile API"]
|
||||
+1
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
epic = "ux-and-install"
|
||||
+131
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
|
||||
# Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]
|
||||
|
||||
**Feature Branch**: `[###-feature-name]`
|
||||
|
||||
**Created**: [DATE]
|
||||
|
||||
**Status**: Draft
|
||||
|
||||
**Input**: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"
|
||||
|
||||
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
IMPORTANT: User stories should be PRIORITIZED as user journeys ordered by importance.
|
||||
Each user story/journey must be INDEPENDENTLY TESTABLE - meaning if you implement just ONE of them,
|
||||
you should still have a viable MVP (Minimum Viable Product) that delivers value.
|
||||
|
||||
Assign priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.) to each story, where P1 is the most critical.
|
||||
Think of each story as a standalone slice of functionality that can be:
|
||||
- Developed independently
|
||||
- Tested independently
|
||||
- Deployed independently
|
||||
- Demonstrated to users independently
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
2. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3)
|
||||
|
||||
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority]
|
||||
|
||||
### Edge Cases
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right edge cases.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
- What happens when [boundary condition]?
|
||||
- How does system handle [error scenario]?
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right functional requirements.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### Functional Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- **FR-001**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"]
|
||||
- **FR-002**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"]
|
||||
- **FR-003**: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"]
|
||||
- **FR-004**: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"]
|
||||
- **FR-005**: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"]
|
||||
|
||||
*Example of marking unclear requirements:*
|
||||
|
||||
- **FR-006**: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?]
|
||||
- **FR-007**: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
|
||||
|
||||
- **[Entity 1]**: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation]
|
||||
- **[Entity 2]**: [What it represents, relationships to other entities]
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: Define measurable success criteria.
|
||||
These must be technology-agnostic and measurable.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### Measurable Outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
- **SC-001**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"]
|
||||
- **SC-002**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"]
|
||||
- **SC-003**: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"]
|
||||
- **SC-004**: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]
|
||||
|
||||
## Assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
|
||||
Fill them out with the right assumptions based on reasonable defaults
|
||||
chosen when the feature description did not specify certain details.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
- [Assumption about target users, e.g., "Users have stable internet connectivity"]
|
||||
- [Assumption about scope boundaries, e.g., "Mobile support is out of scope for v1"]
|
||||
- [Assumption about data/environment, e.g., "Existing authentication system will be reused"]
|
||||
- [Dependency on existing system/service, e.g., "Requires access to the existing user profile API"]
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user